arrow Products
Glide CMS image Glide CMS image
Glide CMS arrow
The powerful intuitive headless CMS for busy content and editorial teams, bursting with features and sector insight. MACH architecture gives you business freedom.
Glide Go image Glide Go image
Glide Go arrow
Enterprise power at start-up speed. Glide Go is a pre-configured deployment of Glide CMS with hosting and front-end problems solved.
Glide Nexa image Glide Nexa image
Glide Nexa arrow
Audience authentication, entitlements, and preference management in one system designed for publishers and content businesses.
For your sector arrow arrow
Media & Entertainment
arrow arrow
Built for any content to thrive, whomever it's for. Get content out faster and do more with it.
Sports & Gaming
arrow arrow
Bring fans closer to their passions and deliver unrivalled audience experiences wherever they are.
Publishing
arrow arrow
Tailored to the unique needs of publishing so you can fully focus on audiences and content success.
For your role arrow arrow
Technology
arrow arrow
Unlock resources and budget with low-code & no-code solutions to do so much more.
Editorial & Content
arrow arrow
Make content of higher quality quicker, and target it with pinpoint accuracy at the right audiences.
Developers
arrow arrow
MACH architecture lets you kickstart development, leveraging vast native functionality and top-tier support.
Commercial & Marketing
arrow arrow
Speedrun ideas into products, accelerate ROI, convert interest, and own the conversation.
Technology Partners arrow
AWS image
AWS
arrow arrow
Vercel image
Vercel
arrow arrow
Pugpig image
Pugpig
arrow arrow
Poool image
Poool
arrow arrow
Solution Partners arrow
Code Store image
Code Store
arrow arrow
The App Lab image
The App Lab
arrow arrow
Polemic Digital image
Polemic Digital
arrow arrow
Made by Many image
Made by Many
arrow arrow
Industry Insights arrow arrow
News
arrow arrow
News from inside our world, about Glide Publishing Platform, our customers, and other cool things.
Comment
arrow arrow
Insight and comment about the things which make content and publishing better - or sometimes worse.
Newsletter
arrow arrow
The Content Aware weekly newsletter, with news and comment every Thursday.
Knowledge arrow arrow
Customer Support
arrow arrow
Learn more about the unrivalled customer support from the team at Glide.
Documentation
arrow arrow
User Guides and Technical Documentation for Glide Publishing Platform headless CMS, Glide Go, and Glide Nexa.
Developer Experience
arrow arrow
Learn more about using Glide headless CMS, Glide Go, and Glide Nexa identity management.

Distance is no object to finding new readers - but culture might be

US publishers such as the New York Times and Washington Post are actively expanding their readership in the United Kingdom. Are they a threat domestic publishers can ignore?

by Rob Corbidge
Published: 16:18, 18 August 2022

Rob Corbidge is Head of Content Intelligence at Glide Publishing Platform, applying the latest knowledge about advances and ideas in the publishing industry to our own product and helping clients get the most from their content.

UK and US flags

The Washington Post has reaffirmed its intention to expand its staffing footprint in the UK, making at least two (more?) American tanks on the country's media lawn, along with the NYT.

We're also told that the much-heralded-but-yet-to-launch Semafor, and the Insider network (which has already recast its UK editorial aims), are similarly aiming to gain subscription readers in the elusive but lucrative "college educated" sector of new markets.

The NYT and Washington Post are both establishing a global hub network, with editorial teams in London and other centres such as Seoul taking over operational control during the portion of the working day when the main US readership and editorial offices are asleep. This aspect of their operations is clearly designed to bring a global news coverage capability, an "always vigilant" newsroom chain that can publish and update 24/7.

From the standpoint of an avid reader of international news it's hard to see a downside to this expansion, as the type of stories covered will generally be of the seismic national and/or international level. Yet avid readers of international news are surely a limited size audience, albeit a golden subscription goose in terms of their willingness to pay for news.

It seems to be the case that the NYT and WaPo are gaining new English-speaking readers from these audiences. I can only talk of the Wall Street Journal as a frequent user, yet for coverage of international affairs it brings a depth of reporting that only those tasked with the care of wealth can produce. I do not mean this as a bad thing.

If your political sympathies somewhat align with those of the NYT or WaPo, then you will surely find good reporting. And even if they don't align. They are professionals after all. Obviously this isn't all one-way traffic: The Guardian continues its trajectory of growth in the United States, along with a few others.

Yet it is the threat to the domestic market that is my primary point of thought here. Both the NYT and WaPo have expanded staff numbers in London, who report on the UK, and could it be they intend to take a slice of that "college educated" domestic news market?

It's a steep challenge, and like the saga of UK grocer Tesco heading off to hawk its wares to Uncle Sam, it's one fraught with perhaps unexpected cultural challenges for the editorial teams (let alone the business teams).

Having worked in editorial under a London/Glasgow satellite newsroom system, with me being on the Scottish side of the system, I can tell you it's not an easy balancing act to perfect. 

How much a US publisher can discern, adapt, and make the decisions necessary to provide the kind of truly relevant and culturally rooted news coverage in a complex market such as Britain remains an open question.

London gets Scotland wrong quite often, hence the big UK publishing operations in Scotland tend to enjoy a large degree of autonomy, with the necessary trust being placed in the staff on the ground.

We've already seen the NYT make some serious mis-steps, such as failing to understand the importance of pantomimes to the British theatre economy, a number of which crimes saw our own Times (of London if you please) respond in print.

It's not a challenge of technology which makes cutting such market inroads difficult. In fact, it is the opportunity that technology brings that makes such options available to ambitious publishers.

However one only has to be familiar with the posts on a well-run local area Facebook group to understand the granularity that's required to truly understand a locale. The only regret there is that groups tend to be hosted on FB!

Currently the main opportunities in UK news media would seem to be those of format - we as yet have no domestic version of the scale or success of Axios for example. It's not easily imaginable that a US (or other non-domestic) entrant can seize that area and expand, but it's not impossible. 

There must not be complacency among domestic publishers, but ambition.

Latest articles

Journalism under surveillance takes a new turn as OpenAI asks to see your notebooks
OpenAI's dystopian hello to journalists and publishers
arrow button
a person running away from technology
Quit running from news: fear of fakery is greater than the fake itself
arrow button
Googles golden jail cell and the problem of the internet
Google's golden jail cell is a metaphor for the web, and we're all struggling to break out
arrow button

Ready to get started?

No matter where you are on your CMS journey, we're here to help. Want more info or to see Glide Publishing Platform in action? We got you.

Book a demo