arrow Products
Glide CMS image Glide CMS image
Glide CMS arrow
The powerful intuitive headless CMS for busy content and editorial teams, bursting with features and sector insight. MACH architecture gives you business freedom.
Glide Go image Glide Go image
Glide Go arrow
Enterprise power at start-up speed. Glide Go is a pre-configured deployment of Glide CMS with hosting and front-end problems solved.
Glide Nexa image Glide Nexa image
Glide Nexa arrow
Audience authentication, entitlements, and preference management in one system designed for publishers and content businesses.
For your sector arrow arrow
Media & Entertainment
arrow arrow
Built for any content to thrive, whomever it's for. Get content out faster and do more with it.
Sports & Gaming
arrow arrow
Bring fans closer to their passions and deliver unrivalled audience experiences wherever they are.
Publishing
arrow arrow
Tailored to the unique needs of publishing so you can fully focus on audiences and content success.
For your role arrow arrow
Technology
arrow arrow
Unlock resources and budget with low-code & no-code solutions to do so much more.
Editorial & Content
arrow arrow
Make content of higher quality quicker, and target it with pinpoint accuracy at the right audiences.
Developers
arrow arrow
MACH architecture lets you kickstart development, leveraging vast native functionality and top-tier support.
Commercial & Marketing
arrow arrow
Speedrun ideas into products, accelerate ROI, convert interest, and own the conversation.
Technology Partners arrow
AWS image
AWS
arrow arrow
Vercel image
Vercel
arrow arrow
Pugpig image
Pugpig
arrow arrow
Poool image
Poool
arrow arrow
Solution Partners arrow
Code Store image
Code Store
arrow arrow
The App Lab image
The App Lab
arrow arrow
Polemic Digital image
Polemic Digital
arrow arrow
Made by Many image
Made by Many
arrow arrow
Industry Insights arrow arrow
News
arrow arrow
News from inside our world, about Glide Publishing Platform, our customers, and other cool things.
Comment
arrow arrow
Insight and comment about the things which make content and publishing better - or sometimes worse.
Newsletter
arrow arrow
The Content Aware weekly newsletter, with news and comment every Thursday.
Knowledge arrow arrow
Customer Support
arrow arrow
Learn more about the unrivalled customer support from the team at Glide.
Documentation
arrow arrow
User Guides and Technical Documentation for Glide Publishing Platform headless CMS, Glide Go, and Glide Nexa.
Developer Experience
arrow arrow
Learn more about using Glide headless CMS, Glide Go, and Glide Nexa identity management.

Trust is the hardest metric of all to steer

AI content: to label it, or not? New research has some interesting conclusions.

by Rob Corbidge
Published: 15:54, 07 December 2023

Rob Corbidge is Head of Content Intelligence at Glide Publishing Platform, applying the latest knowledge about advances and ideas in the publishing industry to our own product and helping clients get the most from their content.

Tesla Cybertruck by Stable Diffusion

Trust is tricky. Tesla's new Cybertruck features a drive-by-wire system, a world first in a production car. There is no mechanical linkage between the steering wheel and the steering system. 

Why it has taken so long to introduce such an "innovation" into cars, when such technology has served in such failure-critical systems as still-in-service combat aircraft since 1976 and commercial aircraft since 1984?

It's partly a question of cost up to this point and also partly a question of trust. 

We're concerned with trust. Any incident where there was implication of a drive-by-wire failure could have potentially destroyed the sales floor prospects for an entire vehicle run and besmirched the brand for many years. We will see if others follow where Tesla has led as consumers transition from driving cars to in fact directing processors that drive the cars. It's of course likely Tesla have introduced the technology with a bigger picture view to their own plans for self-driving cars and other vehicles.

Trust is a massive thing in publishing of course. There's a newsdesk mantra I still use, coming from a Dutch phrase: "Trust arrives on foot but leaves on horseback". It's true. Get it right and you're just getting it right. Get it wrong and all the times you have been right come into question.

A new piece of research from University of Minnesota Professor Benjamin Toff and Oxford University's Felix Simon explores audience trust in AI generated news. The genesis of the research was simple: Toff said he was asked about trust in AI-generated news and "I didn’t know the answer, so we did an experiment!"

For those interested, the paper "Or they could just not use it?”: The Paradox of AI Disclosure for Audience Trust in News is here.

The vital question seems to hinge around whether to actually tell an audience they are consuming AI-generated content and the potential pitfalls if a) you do, and b) you don't. 

As the paper puts it: ""While a growing number of publishers have begun responding to these concerns by adding labels to AI-generated content, there is no shared consensus about what such disclosure should look like nor agreement over what level of AI-involvement should trigger labelling."

The research saw a selected sample group shown a variety of AI-generated news content. Some of the group were just shown the AI-generated material with no disclosure that it was such. Others were shown the same content with disclosure, and others had disclosure along with a list of sources the AI-generated content was drawn from.

Perhaps not surprisingly, it was this second group who rated the news content as least trustworthy. Yet, for accuracy and fairness of the content, both the first and second groups scored the content about the same.

Interestingly, a sub group of those tested had what researchers in the field call Procedural News Knowledge or PNK, defined as "familiarity with what legitimate news production and reporting entails". A good number of GPP subscribers will almost certainly be included in such a group. This PNK group recorded lower levels of trust in the disclosed AI content than any other. 

However, I'd say the PNK group would without a doubt express lower levels of trust in any content. If you know how it's built, you know how to knock it down.

We are at an early stage for the uses of AI-generated content. It's important to assume people aren't stupid. In time, if such content proves to be of use, then people will become accustomed to it and trust will form. The human brain adapts quickly. Think of your own response to the volume of AI-generated images you likely see each week. Most of us have already absorbed the visual aspects that denote such images without thinking about it, and immediately categorise them as such.

Regarding such opinions around trustworthiness, as the researchers point out, any research into news journalism already carries a significant burden in that general trust in news, we are repeatedly told, is at an all-time low. Tell that to the 17th-century political pamphleteers of the English Civil War.

Latest articles

Journalism under surveillance takes a new turn as OpenAI asks to see your notebooks
OpenAI's dystopian hello to journalists and publishers
arrow button
a person running away from technology
Quit running from news: fear of fakery is greater than the fake itself
arrow button
Googles golden jail cell and the problem of the internet
Google's golden jail cell is a metaphor for the web, and we're all struggling to break out
arrow button

Ready to get started?

No matter where you are on your CMS journey, we're here to help. Want more info or to see Glide Publishing Platform in action? We got you.

Book a demo